To pass the test you need to register on this site! Choose only what you like. If you are not sure what to choose – do not choose anything. If you are not satisfied with the result, repeat the test 3 – times and every time slightly change your selection. This test was developed in accordance with the concept of O. Tangemann. It is designed to determine the personality based on the preferences in art. The test material consists of pictures that have been chosen by people who went through Associative Diagnostics. The test consists of 76 questions. Choose only the picture or photo which you like. It takes 5-7 minutes to pass the test.
Analysis of the results of the first 99 people showed that the test is not accurate in the type identification. Almost the same probability of getting a version of the right (expected) type and the type that has little similarity with your actual type (27:25). You are more likely to receive as a version of the type - a subtype, ie type with the very similar functional profile. It may be a similar type of your TPE group - the same programme or creative function. Or one of the subtypes from the other TPE groups (44%), which means similarity of interests: scientists - NT, managers - ST, SF socialists and humanists - NF.
Olga Tangemann 2015 © Associative Socionics
Testing completed!
Congratulations!
To view results please, answer the following questions for the confidential collection of test statistics
Graphs of the distribution of signs
TPE graphics domination
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2 
2
1 
2
2
Please, answer the following questions for the confidential collection of test statistics:
Тип: Робеспьер, Суперэго
Подтип: Джек Лондон, Эго
Профиль: Рациональный
53% – Динамика 47% – Статика
21% – Экстраверсия 79% – Интроверсия
79% – Рациональность 21% – Иррациональность
Функциональный
71% – Логика 29% – Этика
32% – Сенсорика 68% – Интуиция.
Тип определил верно, а вот подтип – походу, мимо. По жизни у себя наблюдаю в качестве подтипа ИЛЭ, а не ЛИЭ, но, возможно, дело в неожиданно высокой для меня рациональности. А статика-динамика у меня действительно “плавающий” параметр по жизни (возможно, натренировала своими хобби? Хз)
First time I scored EII > IEI second time LII>LIE
None of them are my types, I’m SLI and always score SLI on tests.
Тип: Гамлет, Эго
Подтип: Есенин, Суперид
Профиль: Динамичный
ТПЭ
90% – Динамика10% – Статика
45% – Экстраверсия55% – Интроверсия
63% – Рациональность37% – Иррациональность
Функциональный
38% – Логика63% – Этика
24% – Сенсорика76% – Интуиция
Очень точный результат, несколько лет назад, помнится, выходило ЭСЭ. Ольга, поздравляю с отличным тестом!
мм, вы почти угадали штоле
я лии с усиленной интуицией и ослабленной сенсорикой
по тесту я или, причём рациональный, но динамик, и динамика доминирует над рац
подтип — лии
но, хм, мне сложно представлять в уме движущиеся картинки
последовательность статичных — легко, а движущиеся — никак
мои любимые видео — музыкальные клипы-слайдшоу из нескольких рисованных картинок
и обязательно субтитры, потому что я плохо воспринимаю инфо на слух
Тип: Робеспьер, Суперэго
Подтип: Бальзак, Суперид
Профиль: Интровертный
Ничего нового, правда со второго раза, первый результат был зеркальный.
Спасибо. Это экспериментальный тест, но сделать так, чтобы сразу и в правильный тип, очень непросто. Поэтому для анализа ипользуется общая тенденция как приближение. Лучше в целом угадать хоть что-то и наверняка, чем ничего.
Мои результаты теста😨:
1) Тип: Габен, Суперид
Подтип: Штирлиц, Эго
Профиль: Динамичный
2) Тип: Дюма, Суперид
Подтип: Наполеон, Ид
Профиль: Иррациональный
Result
Type: Huxley, Id
Subtype: Yesenin, Superid
Profile: Irrational
Huxley
The intuitive ethical extravert (IEE). The Mentor. IEE are naturally psychologists. They are able to build an opinion about a person very quickly and correctly. IEE enjoy helping people to expand their talents and encourage people to the self-growth and personal development. IEE have very good interpersonal skills and are able to find the individual approach to very different people. IEE are easily distracted, spontaneous, often have a spur-of-a-moment ideas. Their interests are broad and always changing being their life force. They looking for new experiences and wish to be in a new kind of situations and to be inspired by the new concepts. IEE see the multiple potential outcomes of a given situation and are able to hold them all in their head at the same time in order to see the essence of a situation. They see the hidden opportunities and can quickly find the way out of the problematic situation. While talking they often switch from one point to another ignoring the structure. IEE have a strong sense of morals and though they generally try to avoid a conflict, they would stand up for their opinion if their moral principals.
Yesenin
The intuitive ethical introvert (IEI). The Dreamer. IEI often has feelings about the outcome of some actions or situation, being able to say whether the outcome is good or bad, but most of the time not able to explain why or what exactly will happen. Often they are lost in their dreams or thoughts, not noticing what is going on around them. They can influence the emotional atmosphere in a company of people, though the more people are present, the harder it is for the IEIs due to their introversion.
Graphs of the distribution of signs
TPE
50% – Dynamics
50% – Statics
75% – Extraversion
25% – Introversion
21% – Rationality
79% – Irrationality
Functional
41% – Logics
59% – Ethics
24% – Sensing
76% – Intuition
TPE graphics domination
33% – Id
26% – Superid
24% – Ego
17% – Superego
Haneul’s Result
Type: Balzac, Superid
Subtype: Jack London , Ego
Profile: Dynamic
Balzac
The intuitive logical introvert (ILI). The Critic. ILI have the ability to abstract and philosophical thinking, noticing contradictions in conclusions and pointing them to others (critics). There is always logical reasoning behind their conclusions. ILI are able to see the ways to get the profit, often they do not take the opportunity. They are naturally sceptical and can pour the cold water on someone whom they believe to be overenthusiastic. ILI are often sceptical about themselves and their own potential too. They appear to be shy, reserved and unenthusiastic.
Jack London
The logical intuitive extravert (LIE). The Entrepreneur. LIE are the best at hands on tasks, perceive the world as full of possibilities for profit. They know how to solve a problem in the most efficient way, how to use the resources and take into account luck, coincidences and trends. LIE quickly adapt to changes and might switch from one occupation to another if they feel the previous position has exhausted all possibilities. They like to see real-life implementations of their projects and are not interested in completely abstract theories. LIE prefer to earn more rather than to spend less and are happy to spend big sums of money on their life-style and hobbies. They prefer big tasks and work on impulse rather than to do a routine work and might lack attention to the details. The Entrepreneurs are charismatic, well organized, have the foresight, think about the consequences of their actions and avoid unnecessary risk.
Graphs of the distribution of signs
TPE
75% – Dynamics25% – Statics
50% – Extraversion50% – Introversion
38% – Rationality62% – Irrationality
Functional
83% – Logics17% – Ethics
24% – Sensing76% – Intuition
TPE graphics domination
30% – Superid27% – Ego23% – Id20% – Superego
Type: Robespierre, Superego
Subtype: Jack London , Ego
Profile: Rational
Robespierre
The logical intuitive introvert (INTJ). The Analyst. LII are often perfectionists, see the world as a single structured system, where all the elements are logically interconnected. People of this type strain after order and logic in their own mind and around them. LII are able to pay attention to details and work accurately. They have very stiff principles and ideas of justice. These are based on their logic and therefore on the idea of fairness, but not on the moral rules of the society or family. They are ready to defend their principles and will not walk past something they see as injustice. LII put their principles higher than their own interests or interests of their family and the close ones. The Analysts are able to see multiple potential outcomes and are seeking knowledge in wide spectrum of topics. They prefer abstract theories and are a lot less interested in their practical implementation.
Jack London
The logical intuitive extravert (LIE). The Entrepreneur. LIE are the best at hands on tasks, perceive the world as full of possibilities for profit. They know how to solve a problem in the most efficient way, how to use the resources and take into account luck, coincidences and trends. LIE quickly adapt to changes and might switch from one occupation to another if they feel the previous position has exhausted all possibilities. They like to see real-life implementations of their projects and are not interested in completely abstract theories. LIE prefer to earn more rather than to spend less and are happy to spend big sums of money on their life-style and hobbies. They prefer big tasks and work on impulse rather than to do a routine work and might lack attention to the details. The Entrepreneurs are charismatic, well organized, have the foresight, think about the consequences of their actions and avoid unnecessary risk.
Graphs of the distribution of signs
TPE
46% – Dynamics54% – Statics
43% – Extraversion57% – Introversion
62% – Rationality38% – Irrationality
Functional
64% – Logics36% – Ethics
13% – Sensing87% – Intuition
TPE graphics domination
29% – Superego25% – Ego24% – Superid23% – Id
Hmm.
I usually test EII and are considered EII also by other socionists. LII is another possible type but I think I’m better at Fe than Te.
LIE… kinda off. I’m not that efficient.