If you look at Tatyana Polyakova’s photos, you might think that her type is irrational, but it is not. Simply, she deals with a unique theme of style and etiquette, and perhaps something else. She is a representative of the intuitive type LII, hence a few unexpected decisions in her clothes. You can draw a parallel with Viktor Gulenko, who creates unexpected ideas that do not fit into the usual framework of concepts and appear strange at times. This happens with rational types … if the approach is creative.
What does this mean in relation to similarity with other types? Her subtype will be irrational ILE or ILI. Polyakova’s outfits are quite extravagant, however, I didn’t notice combinations of dynamic colors (red and black). I think that may well be a subtype of ILE with a major element as the uniqueness of choice.
If you agree with me regarding her type, then can you spot the signs of rationality and other characteristics of type LII in her pictures? What are the hints?
J.T.: I think I remember from at least one LII description something about choosing clothes that are in tune with LII’s profession. Being “irrational” in this aspect of her might be “filtered” through a business goal. Balancing on an edge of “strange” without becoming a “true weirdo” (a Polish example of someone being closer to “true weirdo” stereotype is Tomasz Jacyków ( https://www.google.com/search?q=Tomasz%20Jacyk%C3%B3w… 🙂 People will remember her more easily, so more exposure, so more business opportunities?
From my current not-that-deep understanding… 🙂 : Introvert-Extrovert: more of the closed body positions, not that much expression, almost no colours (dark blue, pale red, gold). Rational-Irrational: she has a “judging” gaze, doesn’t use much “flashy” jewellery and accessories, she seems “awaken and present”, some of her “more philosophical” photos are clearly posed. As I remember from your article, those two characteristics (without knowledge of Statics-Dynamics) would lead us to Super Ego group. What should one do then? Out of ESI, LSI, EII and LII discard ESI and EII because of “subdued femininity”? Then out of LSI and LII discard LSI based on her “weirdness”? 😮 Other things: She smiles in a few of the posed photos when she sees she has some attention, so there is a “playful vibe” buried deeper somewhere there.
O.T.: Very clear introvert, closed poses and not bright colours of clothes. Black and white combination of colours refers to introvert and/or logic. In some pictures, her image reminds of academic or judge or teacher. It is a rational stand which combined with introversion points to Superego type. The picture where she stands near the picture on the wall made me think about LII and rationality – very straight, reserved, not looking into the camera. Neatly dressed in the same colour. And whenever she combines colour and patterns it is still pretty normal and nothing out of ordinary – a combination of mainly 2 colours only.
Also Her very tidy hairdo. She is using ribbon on her head often to make her look a bit more sophisticated but it is either black or white and reminds me of old Audrey Hepburn style. Rather old fashioned than futuristic. Nothing out of the military style which you can see often in a style of dress for LSI. The face expression unemotional most of the time, cold and as you mentioned … judgemental which suggests rather logics than ethics.
Recent comments